By Kavaljit Singh | Policy Brief # 4 | May 2, 2019
It is difficult to make any generalization on the countries’ experiences as significant heterogeneity exists across countries in terms of type, nature, sequencing, and intensity of capital controls. However, some notable trends are visible. For instance, over the last three decades, there has been a marked shift regarding preference over the types of capital controls, from the earlier quantitative restrictions to price-based controls. The growing preference for using price-based mechanisms is largely in tune with a market-based approach to…
By Kavaljit Singh | Policy Brief # 3 | April 5, 2019
Contrary to popular perception, both the developed and the developing countries have extensively used a variety of capital controls to restrict and regulate the cross-border movement of capital. Although the types of capital controls and their implementation varied from country to country, it would be difficult to find any country in the world that had not used these at some point or the other.
Modern capital controls in the form of taxes on the purchase of foreign assets came into…
By Kavaljit Singh | Briefing Paper # 24 | March 23, 2019
The financial transaction tax is an issue that never goes away from the public agenda completely. It keeps coming back to the policy and political discussions in different forms across the world. Currently, the idea of a financial transaction tax (FTT) is gaining in popularity within the Democratic Party of the United States as a policy tool to curb excessive speculation and high-frequency trading that destabilizes markets; and to generate a significant amount of revenue to finance social programs…
By Kavaljit Singh | Policy Brief # 2 | January 10, 2019
The massive surge in capital inflows to emerging market economies (EMEs) following the 2008 global financial crisis has reignited the debate on the pros and cons of international capital mobility. While free movement of capital across borders can reduce the cost of capital, enable investments and allow investors to diversify their portfolio, it can also pose significant systemic risks in the recipient country with negative consequences for growth and development.
Large capital inflows in excess of domestic absorption capacity could…
By Kavaljit Singh | Policy Brief # 1 | January 2, 2019
Capital controls are back in fashion. In the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis, there is a renewed interest in capital controls as useful policy tools to prevent or mitigate financial crises. It is increasingly being acknowledged in policy circles that capital controls could insulate the domestic economy from volatile capital flows, due to the limited effectiveness of other policy measures (such as sterilization of capital flows and accumulation of foreign reserves). As many complexities are surrounding the…
The view expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Madhyam. Madhyam welcomes and values your contributions to this blog. For further details, please contact us (madhyamblog@gmail.com).
We encourage you to communicate freely and openly about the themes covered in the blog.
You agree not to post any material that you do not have the right to post, for example, under intellectual property, confidentiality, privacy or other applicable laws.
You agree that your posted contributions will be licensed under the Creative Commons license applicable to comments where you post your material.
All comments will be moderated and published at the sole discretion of the Madhyam editorial team.
Madhyam reserves the right to delete, modify, refuse to post or remove (without notice or explanation) any Content, in whole or part, and to block any Contributor for any reason, at its sole discretion.
Madhyam also reserves the right to take any other action as may be appropriate in the circumstances.