Norway's oil riches and the Dongria
Kondh
Kavaljit Singh
International Herald Tribune
December 18, 2007
Dressed
in their traditional attire, the tribal representatives came all the way from
the remote Niyamgiri hills of Orissa
to express gratitude to the Norwegian authorities for selling the country's
equity stake in the British-based metal company, Vedanta Resources, on ethical
grounds.
The Dongria Kondhs have been opposing
a proposed $850 million aluminum refinery and bauxite mining project belonging
to Vedanta. Representatives of the tribe assert that the project would lead to
a substantial loss of their livelihoods and traditional culture, and would
destroy water sources.
Dongria
Kondhs largely survive on hunting, gathering and
forest produce in their hilly region.
Given the
poor economic status and weak political clout of the tribal community, their
concerns were initially largely overlooked by both state agencies and company
officials.
However,
their resistance received a major boost two years ago when campaigners, human
rights groups and advocacy groups from
Unlike
other sovereign wealth funds from the Middle East and Asia,
The
evaluation of the investment portfolio from ethical perspectives is frequently
carried out by the Norwegian fund's Council of Ethics.
On the
recommendations of the council, the fund had sold its equity stake in several
major corporations in the recent past. Interestingly, such penal actions had no
adverse impact on the fund's financial performance.
After
carrying out investigations in Vedanta's four Indian subsidiaries, the council
submitted its report to
Based on
the council's advice, the Norwegian Finance Ministry ordered the fund to sell
off its stake in Vedanta. On Nov. 6, the ministry announced the completion of
sale at its Web site.
Undoubtedly,
the Norwegian decision has lifted the morale of Dongria
Kondhs and their supporters. They feel that their
concerns stand vindicated.
Should
one welcome the
Until
now, such boycott actions have been largely used to put pressure on repressive
regimes (such as
Perhaps
this is the first time that such action took place in a private investment
project located in a democratic third-world country.
Should
boycott action be the only effective way to bring corporate accountability?
The
answer is no, for three main reasons.
First,
the real political contest for tribal community remains with the local and
national authorities, that have the legal power to
regulate the corporations and enforce human rights and other standards within
their jurisdictions.
Second,
on a purely financial basis,
Lastly,
But in
this case, at least it is a moral victory for the Dongria
Kondhs.
Kavaljit Singh, director of the Public Interest Research Center in New Delhi,
is the author of "Why Investment Matters" and "Questioning
Globalization."